<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Why LLMs Cannot Think and How to Fix It · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2503.09211/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2503.09211/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Why LLMs Cannot Think and How to Fix It — mentioned by LordDragonfang</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44252614</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2503.09211:44252614</guid><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2025 22:44:30 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.09211 I am thoroughly unimpressed by this paper. It sets up a vague strawman definition of &amp;quot;thinking&amp;quot; that I&amp;#x27;m not aware of anyone using (and makes no claim it applies to humans) and then knocks down the strawman. It also leans way too heavy on determinism - For one thing, we have no way of knowing if human brains are deterministic (until we solve whether reality itself is). For another, I doubt you would suddenly reverse your position if we created a LoRa composed of atmospheric noise, so it does not support your real position. &amp;gt;…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2503.09211/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Why LLMs Cannot Think and How to Fix It — mentioned by cluckindan</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44250312</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2503.09211:44250312</guid><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2025 18:18:42 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;They don’t ”think”. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.09211 They don’t ”reason”. https://ml-site.cdn-apple.com/papers/the-illusion-of-thinkin... They don’t even always output their internal state accurately. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.05410&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2503.09211/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
