HackerPapers

arXiv:2503.04761cs.CY

Which Economic Tasks are Performed with AI? Evidence from Millions of Claude Conversations

Kunal Handa, Alex Tamkin, Miles McCain, Saffron Huang, Esin Durmus, Sarah Heck, Jared Mueller, Jerry Hong, Stuart Ritchie, Tim Belonax, Kevin K. Troy, Dario Amodei, Jared Kaplan, Jack Clark, Deep Ganguli

Abstract

Despite widespread speculation about artificial intelligence's impact on the future of work, we lack systematic empirical evidence about how these systems are actually being used for different tasks. Here, we present a novel framework for measuring AI usage patterns across the economy. We leverage a recent privacy-preserving system to analyze over four million Claude.ai conversations through the lens of tasks and occupations in the U.S. Department of Labor's O*NET Database. Our analysis reveals that AI usage primarily concentrates in software development and writing tasks, which together account for nearly half of all total usage. However, usage of AI extends more broadly across the economy, with approximately 36% of occupations using AI for at least a quarter of their associated tasks. We also analyze how AI is being used for tasks, finding 57% of usage suggests augmentation of human capabilities (e.g., learning or iterating on an output) while 43% suggests automation (e.g., fulfilling a request with minimal human involvement). While our data and methods face important limitations and only paint a picture of AI usage on a single platform, they provide an automated, granular approach for tracking AI's evolving role in the economy and identifying leading indicators of future impact as these technologies continue to advance.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CYComputers and Society cs.AIArtificial Intelligence cs.CLComputation and Language cs.HCHuman-Computer Interaction cs.LGMachine Learning

On Hacker News

Linked by 3 identifiable commenters in 3 comments across 2 threads, from Aug 2025 to Aug 2025. Found in 1 HN submission from Jul 2025 to Jul 2025. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

    • When the Stanford paper looked at augment vs automate, they used the data from Anthropic's AI Economic Index. That paper defined the terms like this: We also analyze how AI is being used for tasks, finding 57% of usage suggests augmentation of human capabilities (e.g., learning…

      WillPostForFoodView on HNParent context

    • I was also curious about this. Table A1 on page 56 lists examples of positions that are automated vs augmented, and these are the positions the authors think are going to be most augmented (allegedly taken from [0]): - Chief Executives - Maintenance and Repair Workers, General…

      tart-lemonadeView on HNParent context

    • There is a comparable study from Anthropic: "Which Economic Tasks are Performed with AI? Evidence from Millions of Claude Conversations" https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.04761 It says: "Our analysis reveals that AI usage primarily concentrates in software development and writing…

      amaiView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.