<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>LLMs Can Generate a Better Answer by Aggregating Their Own Responses · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2503.04104/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2503.04104/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>LLMs Can Generate a Better Answer by Aggregating Their Own Responses — mentioned by selecsosi</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47199330</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2503.04104:47199330</guid><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 19:40:43 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This was my approach when using agents to analyze HVAC IoT data doing anomaly detection / investigations and it similarly worked very well. Mix that with some context like install location, geographic features with some context / info on seasonality (like ASHRAE values for the regions), and some classification like (residential / commercial), the bot was quite able to deliver actual insights into problems vs creating a bunch of excess noise. We also mixed in some GSA (https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.04104) steps during the analysis in the sub agents to further reduce hallucinations&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2503.04104/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
