<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Luttinger compensated bipolarized magnetic semiconductor · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2502.18136/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2502.18136/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Luttinger compensated bipolarized magnetic semiconductor — mentioned by westurner</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49980092</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2502.18136:49980092</guid><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 15:36:56 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;From the article: &amp;gt; Candidate 1: Designed a Luttinger Compensated Magnet, YBaMnFeO₅ &amp;gt; Candidate 2: Identified a Luttinger Compensated Magnet in KV[Cr(CN)₆] from 1999 &amp;gt; KV[Cr(CN)₆] belongs to the same family as Prussian blue, the 300-year-old pigment. An actual validation would be complex; so let&amp;#x27;s try and see what parts of this argument are grounded and feasible? /? Prussian blue antiferromagnetic: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Prussian+blue+antiferro... : - a number of articles confirming antiferromagnetic effects /? Luttinger-compensated Prussian blue: - &amp;quot;Luttinger-compensated…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2502.18136/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cond-mat.mtrl-sci</category></item></channel></rss>
