<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Muon is Scalable for LLM Training · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2502.16982/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2502.16982/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Muon is Scalable for LLM Training — mentioned by in-silico</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46785480</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2502.16982:46785480</guid><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 19:51:09 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;A lot of people point to the Muon optimizer that Moonshot (the creators of Kimi) pioneered. Compared to the standard optimizer AdamW, Muon amplifies low-magnitude gradient directions which makes the model learn faster (and maybe gives Kimi its unique qualities). Muon paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.16982&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2502.16982/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Muon is Scalable for LLM Training — mentioned by godelski</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45391803</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2502.16982:45391803</guid><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 22:46:45 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Apologies if this came across the wrong way I was uncertain but your other statements made me think that sentiment was unintentional. I just want to push back against it because it is too common and misused even with good intentions. I hope you don&amp;#x27;t see this as me saying anything about your character. Honestly, impressions are that you do care. &amp;gt; It sounds like the generalisation of projected gradient decent to &amp;quot;Muon&amp;quot; I&amp;#x27;m not a niche expert here, but do have knowledge in adjacent/overlapping domains. It sounds like you&amp;#x27;re in a similar boat? I ask because this pulls back to what I was…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2502.16982/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
