HackerPapers

arXiv:2502.15657cs.AI

Superintelligent Agents Pose Catastrophic Risks: Can Scientist AI Offer a Safer Path?

Yoshua Bengio, Michael Cohen, Damiano Fornasiere, Joumana Ghosn, Pietro Greiner, Matt MacDermott, Sören Mindermann, Adam Oberman, Jesse Richardson, Oliver Richardson, Marc-Antoine Rondeau, Pierre-Luc St-Charles, David Williams-King

Abstract

The leading AI companies are increasingly focused on building generalist AI agents -- systems that can autonomously plan, act, and pursue goals across almost all tasks that humans can perform. Despite how useful these systems might be, unchecked AI agency poses significant risks to public safety and security, ranging from misuse by malicious actors to a potentially irreversible loss of human control. We discuss how these risks arise from current AI training methods. Indeed, various scenarios and experiments have demonstrated the possibility of AI agents engaging in deception or pursuing goals that were not specified by human operators and that conflict with human interests, such as self-preservation. Following the precautionary principle, we see a strong need for safer, yet still useful, alternatives to the current agency-driven trajectory. Accordingly, we propose as a core building block for further advances the development of a non-agentic AI system that is trustworthy and safe by design, which we call Scientist AI. This system is designed to explain the world from observations, as opposed to taking actions in it to imitate or please humans. It comprises a world model that generates theories to explain data and a question-answering inference machine. Both components operate with an explicit notion of uncertainty to mitigate the risks of overconfident predictions. In light of these considerations, a Scientist AI could be used to assist human researchers in accelerating scientific progress, including in AI safety. In particular, our system can be employed as a guardrail against AI agents that might be created despite the risks involved. Ultimately, focusing on non-agentic AI may enable the benefits of AI innovation while avoiding the risks associated with the current trajectory. We hope these arguments will motivate researchers, developers, and policymakers to favor this safer path.

arXiv comments
v2 with fixed formatting for URLs and hyperlinks
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.AIArtificial Intelligence cs.LGMachine Learning

On Hacker News

Linked by 2 identifiable commenters in 2 comments across 2 threads, from May 2025 to Jun 2025.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

    • This seems to be a funding proposal for "Scientist AI."[1] Start reading around page 21. They're arguing for "model-based AI", with a "world model". But they're vague about what form that "world model" takes. This is a good idea if you can do it. But people have been bashing…

      AnimatsView on HNParent context

    • In a preprint titled "Superintelligent Agents Pose Catastrophic Risks: Can Scientist AI Offer a Safer Path?" (https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.15657), Yoshua Bengio et al propose a safer alternative to AGI through "scientist AIs" that explain but do not have agency, which they define…

      esafakView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.