<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Stochastic Parrot on LLM's Shoulder: A Summative Assessment of Physical Concept Understanding · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2502.08946/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2502.08946/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Stochastic Parrot on LLM's Shoulder: A Summative Assessment of Physical Concept Understanding — mentioned by bgwalter</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46337883</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2502.08946:46337883</guid><pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2025 17:34:25 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Regarding the stochastic parrots: It is easy to see that LLMs exclusively parrot by asking them about current political topics [1], because they cannot plagiarize settled history from Wikipedia and Britannica. But of course there also is the equivalence between LLMs and Markov chains. As far as I can see, it does not rely on absurd equivalences like encoding all possible output states in an infinite Markov chain: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.02724 Then there is stochastic parrot research: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.08946 &amp;quot;The stochastic parrot phenomenon is present in LLMs, as they fail on our…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2502.08946/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
