<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Utility Engineering: Analyzing and Controlling Emergent Value Systems in AIs · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2502.08640/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2502.08640/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Utility Engineering: Analyzing and Controlling Emergent Value Systems in AIs — mentioned by ern_ave</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47237517</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2502.08640:47237517</guid><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 19:25:31 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Since the page mentions: &amp;gt; Better judgment around refusals Has any AI company ever addressed any instance of a model having different rules for different population groups? I&amp;#x27;ve seen many examples of people asking questions like, &amp;quot;make up a joke about &amp;lt;group&amp;gt;&amp;quot; and then iterating through the groups, only to find that some groups are seemingly protected/privileged from having jokes made about them. Has any AI company ever addressed studies like [1] which found that models value certain groups vastly more than others? For example, page 14 of this studies shows that the exchange rate (their word…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2502.08640/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Utility Engineering: Analyzing and Controlling Emergent Value Systems in AIs — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45704770</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2502.08640:45704770</guid><pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2025 15:49:32 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Utility Engineering: Analyzing and Controlling Emergent Value Systems in AIs&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2502.08640/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Utility Engineering: Analyzing and Controlling Emergent Value Systems in AIs — mentioned by selfmodruntime</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43388792</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2502.08640:43388792</guid><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 14:09:29 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Empiric research as been done that shows current AI models to be left-leaning. Here is some (non-empiric) displayed data: https://trackingai.org/political-test Here is some research on that matter: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.08640 Here is more: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016726812...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2502.08640/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
