<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>MATH-Perturb: Benchmarking LLMs' Math Reasoning Abilities against Hard Perturbations · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2502.06453/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2502.06453/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>MATH-Perturb: Benchmarking LLMs' Math Reasoning Abilities against Hard Perturbations — mentioned by nopinsight</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43676897</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2502.06453:43676897</guid><pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2025 00:15:47 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;For the skeptics: Scoring just 10% or so in Math-Perturb-Hard below the original MATH Level 5 (hardest) dataset seems in line with or actually better than most people would do. Does that mean most people are merely parrots too? https://math-perturb.github.io/ https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.06453 Leaderboard: https://math-perturb.github.io/#leaderboard Anyone who continues to use the parrot metaphor should support it with evidence at least as strong as the “On the Biology of a Large Language Model” research by Anthropic which the article refers to…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2502.06453/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
