<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>A Counterexample to the Mizohata-Takeuchi Conjecture · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2502.06137/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2502.06137/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>A Counterexample to the Mizohata-Takeuchi Conjecture — mentioned by bradly</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44776237</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2502.06137:44776237</guid><pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2025 12:55:12 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry if this is a silly question, but I came across a &amp;quot;white lie&amp;quot; in a paper(https://arxiv.org/html/2502.06137v2#S3.SS2) yesterday: &amp;gt; Throughout this section, we use A≈B to mean that A and B are essentially equal, in the sense that B is a suitable approximation of A in some sense that we will formalize in a later section. The reader may feel free to assume A=B when verifying estimates, even though A=B is generally false. Is that when this would be needed?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2502.06137/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.CA</category></item><item><title>A Counterexample to the Mizohata-Takeuchi Conjecture — mentioned by thrance</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44767224</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2502.06137:44767224</guid><pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2025 12:55:56 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Heh, take a look at her paper [0]. It is much more complex that TFA makes it out to be: once you have the intuition you need to prove it actually disproves the theorem. Also, it&amp;#x27;s probably a not very well known conjecture that people wouldn&amp;#x27;t care too much about. Also also, it was a conjecture: people were probably looking to prove it rather that disprove it, failing and then giving up. [0] https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.06137&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2502.06137/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.CA</category></item><item><title>A Counterexample to the Mizohata-Takeuchi Conjecture — mentioned by MathMonkeyMan</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44760771</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2502.06137:44760771</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 18:45:21 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;#x27;s a link to the paper on the arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.06137&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2502.06137/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.CA</category></item><item><title>A Counterexample to the Mizohata-Takeuchi Conjecture — mentioned by nextos</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44482588</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2502.06137:44482588</guid><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2025 17:37:01 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;A PhD in the US requires a lot of coursework, aside from research. Perhaps, she is interested in that. Otherwise, some universities, especially in EU, offer PhDs by publication. She could simply wrap up her counter-example publication (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2502.06137) as a thesis and possibly graduate. Sometimes, you can even do this without a supervisor.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2502.06137/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.CA</category></item><item><title>A Counterexample to the Mizohata-Takeuchi Conjecture — mentioned by scythe</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44482028</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2502.06137:44482028</guid><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2025 16:22:50 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Paper here: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.06137 I had the opportunity to take a harmonic analysis course in grad school. I passed it up. It was only tangentially related to my research at the time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2502.06137/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.CA</category></item></channel></rss>
