HackerPapers

arXiv:2502.02631cs.LG

ParetoQ: Improving Scaling Laws in Extremely Low-bit LLM Quantization

Zechun Liu, Changsheng Zhao, Hanxian Huang, Sijia Chen, Jing Zhang, Jiawei Zhao, Scott Roy, Lisa Jin, Yunyang Xiong, Yangyang Shi, Lin Xiao, Yuandong Tian, Bilge Soran, Raghuraman Krishnamoorthi, Tijmen Blankevoort, Vikas Chandra

Abstract

The optimal bit-width for achieving the best trade-off between quantized model size and accuracy has been a subject of ongoing debate. While some advocate for 4-bit quantization, others propose that 1.58-bit offers superior results. However, the lack of a cohesive framework for different bits has left such conclusions relatively tenuous. We present ParetoQ, the first unified framework that facilitates rigorous comparisons across 1-bit, 1.58-bit, 2-bit, 3-bit, and 4-bit quantization settings. Our findings reveal a notable learning transition between 2 and 3 bits: For 3-bits and above, the fine-tuned models stay close to their original pre-trained distributions, whereas for learning 2-bit networks or below, the representations change drastically. By optimizing training schemes and refining quantization functions, ParetoQ surpasses all previous methods tailored to specific bit widths. Remarkably, our ParetoQ ternary 600M-parameter model even outperforms the previous SoTA ternary 3B-parameter model in accuracy, using only one-fifth of the parameters. Extensive experimentation shows that ternary, 2-bit, and 3-bit quantization maintains comparable performance in the size-accuracy trade-off and generally exceeds 4-bit and binary quantization. Considering hardware constraints, 2-bit quantization offers promising potential for memory reduction and speedup.

arXiv comments
NeurIPS 2025. Model weights are available at https://huggingface.co/collections/facebook/mobilellm-6722be18cb86c20ebe113e95
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.LGMachine Learning cs.AIArtificial Intelligence cs.CLComputation and Language cs.CVComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition

On Hacker News

Linked by 3 identifiable commenters in 3 comments across 2 threads, from May 2025 to Oct 2026.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

    • First I just want to say, specifically for Post Training Quantization, I absolutely agree with you. As for why 4 bit is the limit, the ParetoQ paper has some interesting theories: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.02631 That being said, there's a slight misconception about models at…

      nbutton762View on HNParent context

    • >As for why 4 bit is the limit, the ParetoQ paper has some interesting theories: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.02631 Its not so clear to me what their real explanation is. Yes, it is possible to redistribute the quantization error, but this only works when the model is not trained…

      cpldcpuView on HNParent context

    • > The number of quantized bits is a trade off between size and quality. Ideally you should be aiming for a 6-bit or 5-bit model. I've seen some models be unstable at 4-bit (where they will either repeat words or start generating random words). Note that that's a skill issue of…

      kouteiheikaView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.