arXiv:2502.01402cs.CL
Annotation Tool and Dataset for Fact-Checking Podcasts
Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.
Abstract
Podcasts are a popular medium on the web, featuring diverse and multilingual content that often includes unverified claims. Fact-checking podcasts is a challenging task, requiring transcription, annotation, and claim verification, all while preserving the contextual details of spoken content. Our tool offers a novel approach to tackle these challenges by enabling real-time annotation of podcasts during playback. This unique capability allows users to listen to the podcast and annotate key elements, such as check-worthy claims, claim spans, and contextual errors, simultaneously. By integrating advanced transcription models like OpenAI's Whisper and leveraging crowdsourced annotations, we create high-quality datasets to fine-tune multilingual transformer models such as XLM-RoBERTa for tasks like claim detection and stance classification. Furthermore, we release the annotated podcast transcripts and sample annotations with preliminary experiments.
Those are some pretty sweeping allegations made in the 18 bullet points. It would be interesting if you could run an AI summarizer to list which points were raised during Lex's podcast that support each of the 18 bullet points, and then run some kind of AI fact checker on each…
MrCoffee7View on HNParent context