<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Efficient Reasoning with Hidden Thinking · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2501.19201/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2501.19201/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Efficient Reasoning with Hidden Thinking — mentioned by easeout</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42950000</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2501.19201:42950000</guid><pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 15:37:30 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;#x27;s a paper your idea reminds me of. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.19201 It&amp;#x27;s also so not far from Meta&amp;#x27;s large concept model idea.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2501.19201/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>Efficient Reasoning with Hidden Thinking — mentioned by WhitneyLand</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42925761</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2501.19201:42925761</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2025 00:46:38 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Examples go back 50 years, across many of the disciplines you’ve mentioned, but to throw out one that’s recent, on topic, and highly cited, there’s: Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models https://arxiv.org/pdf/2501.19201 It effectively treats “reasoning” as the ability to generate intermediate steps leading to a correct conclusion. Now, is this valid reasoning? Well, depends on the claim and the definition of reasoning. When someone just says AI can’t reason, I could argue for or against that depending on the specifics. It’s not enough to just say yes or no.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2501.19201/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>Efficient Reasoning with Hidden Thinking — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42919597</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2501.19201:42919597</guid><pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2025 16:06:48 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Efficient Reasoning with Hidden Thinking&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;172 points; 43 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2501.19201/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
