HackerPapers

arXiv:2501.17047cs.CL

How Linguistics Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Language Models

Richard Futrell, Kyle Mahowald

Abstract

Language models can produce fluent, grammatical text. Nonetheless, some maintain that language models don't really learn language and also that, even if they did, that would not be informative for the study of human learning and processing. On the other side, there have been claims that the success of LMs obviates the need for studying linguistic theory and structure. We argue that both extremes are wrong. LMs can contribute to fundamental questions about linguistic structure, language processing, and learning. They force us to rethink arguments and ways of thinking that have been foundational in linguistics. While they do not replace linguistic structure and theory, they serve as model systems and working proofs of concept for gradient, usage-based approaches to language. We offer an optimistic take on the relationship between language models and linguistics.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
doi:10.1017/S0140525X2510112X
Subjects
cs.CLComputation and Language

On Hacker News

Linked by 2 identifiable commenters in 2 comments across 2 threads, from May 2025 to Mar 2026. Found in 1 HN submission from May 2025 to May 2025. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

  1. Stop Sloppypasta 1 comment
    • >There is a reason why the title of Dr.Strangelove is "How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb". Indeed, and somewhat surprisingly some linguists have embraced even this analogy [1] without appreciating the subtext of the title. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.17047

      suddenlybananasView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.