<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Tell me about yourself: LLMs are aware of their learned behaviors · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2501.11120/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2501.11120/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Tell me about yourself: LLMs are aware of their learned behaviors — mentioned by mapontosevenths</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46995273</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2501.11120:46995273</guid><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 21:15:01 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;If we equate self awareness with consciousness then yes. Several papers have now shown that SOTA models have self awareness of at least a limited sort. [0][1] As far as I&amp;#x27;m aware no one has ever proven that for GPT 2, but the methodology for testing it is available if you&amp;#x27;re interested. [0]https://arxiv.org/pdf/2501.11120 [1]https://transformer-circuits.pub/2025/introspection/index.ht...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2501.11120/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>Tell me about yourself: LLMs are aware of their learned behaviors — mentioned by FeepingCreature</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44497564</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2501.11120:44497564</guid><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 06:18:09 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Layman warning! But &amp;quot;at sufficient scale&amp;quot;, like with learning-to-learn, I&amp;#x27;d expect it to pick up largely meta-patterns along with (if not rather than) behavioral habits, especially if the goal is left open, because strategies generalize across goals and thus get reinforcement from every instance of goal pursuit during base training. But also my intuition is that humans are &amp;quot;trained on goals&amp;quot; and then reverse-engineer an explicit goal structure using self-observation and prosaic reasoning. If it works for us, why not the LLMs? edit: Example: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.11120 &amp;quot;Tell me about…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2501.11120/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>Tell me about yourself: LLMs are aware of their learned behaviors — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42815497</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2501.11120:42815497</guid><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2025 17:44:03 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Tell me about yourself: LLMs are aware of their learned behaviors&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2501.11120/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>Tell me about yourself: LLMs are aware of their learned behaviors — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42793447</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2501.11120:42793447</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 14:54:07 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Can LLMs demonstrate behavioral self-awareness?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3 points; 1 discussion reply on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2501.11120/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
