<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Enhancing User Intent for Recommendation Systems via Large Language Models · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2501.10871/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2501.10871/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Enhancing User Intent for Recommendation Systems via Large Language Models — mentioned by svnt</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48026196</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2501.10871:48026196</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 18:03:59 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Look at any recent CoT output where the model is trying to infer from an underspecified prompt what the user wants or means. It is generally the first thing they do — try to figure out what did you mean with this prompt. When they can’t infer your intent, good models ask follow-on questions to clarify. I am wondering if this is a semantics issue as this is an established are of research, eg https://arxiv.org/pdf/2501.10871&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2501.10871/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.IR</category></item></channel></rss>
