<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Authenticated Delegation and Authorized AI Agents · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2501.09674/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2501.09674/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Authenticated Delegation and Authorized AI Agents — mentioned by perfmode</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47497753</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2501.09674:47497753</guid><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 01:52:09 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;As you move toward the public commons stage, you&amp;#x27;ll want to look into subjective trust metrics, specifically Personalized PageRank and EigenTrust. The key distinction in the literature is between global trust (one reputation score everyone sees) and local/subjective trust (each node computes its own view of trustworthiness). Cheng and Friedman (2005) proved that no global, symmetric reputation function is sybilproof, which means personalized trust isn&amp;#x27;t a nice-to-have for a public commons, it&amp;#x27;s the only approach that resists manipulation at scale. The model: humans endorse a KU and stake…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2501.09674/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CY</category></item></channel></rss>
