<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>How is Google using AI for internal code migrations? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2501.06972/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2501.06972/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>How is Google using AI for internal code migrations? — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43460685</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2501.06972:43460685</guid><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 13:13:20 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;How is Google using AI for internal code migrations?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2501.06972/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SE</category></item><item><title>How is Google using AI for internal code migrations? — mentioned by deeviant</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43016806</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2501.06972:43016806</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 19:01:49 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The huge disconnect is that the skill set to use LLMs for code effectively is not the same skill set of standard software engineering. There is a very heavy intersection and I would say you cannot be effective at LLM software development without being an effective software engineer, but being an effective software engineer does not by any means make somebody good at LLM development. Very talented engineers, coworkers, that I would place above myself in skill, seemed stumped by it, while I have realized at least a 10x productively gain. The claim that LLMs are not being applied in mature…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2501.06972/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SE</category></item><item><title>How is Google using AI for internal code migrations? — mentioned by deeviant</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42934903</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2501.06972:42934903</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2025 16:47:53 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;You may have challenges using chat for development (Specifically, I mean text prompting, not necessary using a langchain session with a LLM, although that is my most common mode), but I do not. I have found chat to be, by far, the most productive interface with LLMs for coding. Everything else, is just putting layers, that are not nearly as capable at an LLM, between me and the raw power of the LLM. The core realization I made to truly unlock LLM code assistance as a 10x + productivity gain, is that I am not writing code anymore, I am writing requirements. It means being less an engineer, and…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2501.06972/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SE</category></item><item><title>How is Google using AI for internal code migrations? — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42737439</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2501.06972:42737439</guid><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2025 13:44:23 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;How is Google using AI for internal code migrations?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2501.06972/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SE</category></item></channel></rss>
