<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Timing Properties of the Starlink Ku-Band Downlink · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2501.05302/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2501.05302/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Timing Properties of the Starlink Ku-Band Downlink — mentioned by nomel</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49518013</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2501.05302:49518013</guid><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 04:38:06 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Coherency is a state. My question is if that state can be achieved by just tuning the individual clocks/locations based on GPS as a master. And, there&amp;#x27;s other tricks, with all the inter-satellite communication [1]. And, there&amp;#x27;s a contextual difference here between civilian GPS and military GPS. Much of the precision in the existing GPS satellites is to support the military use of GPS, with intentionally error injected into the civilian side. And, by the nature of the hostile environment the military operates, military craft don&amp;#x27;t have as strong of a reliance on something that&amp;#x27;s ephemeral…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2501.05302/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>eess.SP</category></item></channel></rss>
