<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Towards System 2 Reasoning in LLMs: Learning How to Think With Meta Chain-of-Thought · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2501.04682/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2501.04682/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Towards System 2 Reasoning in LLMs: Learning How to Think With Meta Chain-of-Thought — mentioned by chunpaiyang</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47638503</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2501.04682:47638503</guid><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 12:33:49 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m a software engineer building an app as a side project. I quickly realized AI bullshits a lot. But you know, engineers bullshit each other all the time too. The difference is we have a way to verify it - logical chains. You have to build an argument that holds up before anayone buys in it. So I though, can I make AI build its own logical chain ? Let it pass its own logic check before telling me the result. That&amp;#x27;s how I created my own &amp;quot;think&amp;quot; skill. It&amp;#x27;s based on Meta&amp;#x27;s CoT paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.04682 It roughly works like this: 1. FRAME - Challenge the question itself, hidden…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2501.04682/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>Towards System 2 Reasoning in LLMs: Learning How to Think With Meta Chain-of-Thought — mentioned by chunpaiyang</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47635716</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2501.04682:47635716</guid><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 04:23:10 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;AI lies. The trick is making it double-check itself before it ships. I made a skill that forces AI to think more. Burns more tokens but improve accuracy. I suggest you use Meta CoT(Chain-of-Thought) https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.04682 to build a think skill to avoid this problem.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2501.04682/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>Towards System 2 Reasoning in LLMs: Learning How to Think With Meta Chain-of-Thought — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42655098</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2501.04682:42655098</guid><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2025 12:37:54 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Learning how to think with Meta Chain-of-Thought&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;229 points; 75 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2501.04682/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>Towards System 2 Reasoning in LLMs: Learning How to Think With Meta Chain-of-Thought — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42645122</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2501.04682:42645122</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2025 13:23:18 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Towards System 2 Reasoning in LLMs: Learning How to Think Meta Chain-of-Thought&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2501.04682/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item></channel></rss>
