MEDEC: A Benchmark for Medical Error Detection and Correction in Clinical Notes · HackerPapers discussions

MEDEC: A Benchmark for Medical Error Detection and Correction in Clinical Notes — mentioned by jychang

Thu, 19 Mar 2026 11:05:49 GMT

1. Claiming that gpt-4o and gpt-4.5 came from the same training run is ridiculous, gpt-4.5 was not distilled from the same pretrain as 4o. - Mark Chen has literally publicly said as much, it's a completely different pretrain run. - And clearly if openai has a good big base model before 4.5, they would have released it back in 2024. "How do you think OAI would be able to serve 4.5 at scale if the model itself was 10x total bigger than everything else?" through pipeline parallelism, not tensor parallelism. Don't need to synchronize an all-reduce across clusters. You lose tons of tokens/sec per…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

MEDEC: A Benchmark for Medical Error Detection and Correction in Clinical Notes — mentioned by simonw

Thu, 24 Apr 2025 07:50:25 GMT

The best source I've seen for the 8B number is this TechCrunch article: https://techcrunch.com/2024/07/18/openai-unveils-gpt-4o-mini... > OpenAI would not disclose exactly how large GPT-4o mini is, but said it’s roughly in the same tier as other small AI models, such as Llama 3 8b, Claude Haiku and Gemini 1.5 Flash. As far as I can tell all of the 8B rumors were seeded by that loosely sourced comparison to Llama 3 8B. I know for a fact that Gemini 1.5 Flash is NOT an 8B model, because a separate model called "Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B" came out after that article was published - the first Gemini…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

MEDEC: A Benchmark for Medical Error Detection and Correction in Clinical Notes — HN submission

Fri, 03 Jan 2025 01:12:59 GMT

Medec: A Benchmark for Medical Error Detection and Correction in Clinical Notes

2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.