HackerPapers

arXiv:2412.19215cs.AI

Optimizing Fantasy Sports Team Selection with Deep Reinforcement Learning

Shamik Bhattacharjee, Kamlesh Marathe, Hitesh Kapoor, Nilesh Patil

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Fantasy sports, particularly fantasy cricket, have garnered immense popularity in India in recent years, offering enthusiasts the opportunity to engage in strategic team-building and compete based on the real-world performance of professional athletes. In this paper, we address the challenge of optimizing fantasy cricket team selection using reinforcement learning (RL) techniques. By framing the team creation process as a sequential decision-making problem, we aim to develop a model that can adaptively select players to maximize the team's potential performance. Our approach leverages historical player data to train RL algorithms, which then predict future performance and optimize team composition. This not only represents a huge business opportunity by enabling more accurate predictions of high-performing teams but also enhances the overall user experience. Through empirical evaluation and comparison with traditional fantasy team drafting methods, we demonstrate the effectiveness of RL in constructing competitive fantasy teams. Our results show that RL-based strategies provide valuable insights into player selection in fantasy sports.

arXiv comments
8 Pages including references, Accepted to CODS-COMAD 2024 conference
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.AIArtificial Intelligence cs.LGMachine Learning

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 1 HN submission from Dec 2024 to Dec 2024. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.