<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Qwen2.5 Technical Report · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2412.15115/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2412.15115/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Qwen2.5 Technical Report — mentioned by magicalhippo</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47089780</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2412.15115:47089780</guid><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 16:05:04 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;From what I&amp;#x27;ve gathered, they&amp;#x27;ve been mostly training limited. Better training methods and cleaner training data allows smaller models to rival or outperform larger models training with older methods and lower-quality training data. For example, the Qwen3 technical report[1] says that the Qwen3 models are architecturally very similar to Qwen2.5, with the main change being a tweak in the attention layers to stabilize training. And if you compare table 1 in Qwen3 paper with table 1 in Qwen 2.5 technical report[2], the layer count, attention configuration and such is very similar. Yet Qwen3 was…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2412.15115/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
