<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>On Verbalized Confidence Scores for LLMs · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2412.14737/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2412.14737/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>On Verbalized Confidence Scores for LLMs — mentioned by red75prime</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46159740</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2412.14737:46159740</guid><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2025 11:12:51 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Naturally, their &amp;quot;confidence&amp;quot; is represented as activations in layers close to output, so they might be able to use it. Research ([0], [1], [2], [3]) shows that results of prompting LLMs to express their confidence correlate with their accuracy. The models tend to be overconfident, but in my anecdotal experience the latest models are passably good at judging their own confidence. [0] https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10832237 [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.14737 [2] https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.25532 [3] https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.10913&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2412.14737/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>On Verbalized Confidence Scores for LLMs — mentioned by ogrisel</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43330971</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2412.14737:43330971</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 10:17:44 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;According to the following paper, it&amp;#x27;s possible to get calibrated confidence scores by directly asking the LLM to verbalize a confidence level, but it strongly depends on how you prompt it to do so: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.14737&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2412.14737/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
