<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>MetaMorph: Multimodal Understanding and Generation via Instruction Tuning · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2412.14164/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2412.14164/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>MetaMorph: Multimodal Understanding and Generation via Instruction Tuning — mentioned by unconstrastive</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44278217</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2412.14164:44278217</guid><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2025 19:19:47 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This is why GenAI exists. GenAI took the good people, the money, the resources and the scope. Zuck tolerates entertains ideas until he doesn’t. It’s clear blue sky research is going to be pushed even further into the background I agree with most this, I just think we have different meanings of failure. FAIR has &amp;quot;failed&amp;quot; in the eyes of Meta leadership in that they have not converted into a &amp;quot;frontier AI lab&amp;quot; like Deepmind, and as a result they are being sidelined (much like Google Research, which I admit was a bad example). But the orgs were founded to pursue basic research and I think it&amp;#x27;s not…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2412.14164/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
