<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Normalizing Flows are Capable Generative Models · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2412.06329/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2412.06329/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Normalizing Flows are Capable Generative Models — mentioned by godelski</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44832122</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2412.06329:44832122</guid><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2025 00:38:56 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; which is what you get when you look at non-LLM alternatives to General Intelligence. I disagree with this. There are a good ideas that are worth pursuit. I&amp;#x27;ll give you that few, if any, have been shown to work at scale but I&amp;#x27;d say that&amp;#x27;s a self-fulfilling prophecy. If your bar is that they have to be proven at scale then your bar is that to get investment you&amp;#x27;d have to have enough money to not need investment. How do you compete if you&amp;#x27;re never given the opportunity to compete? You could be the greatest quarterback in the world but if no one will let you play in the NFL then how can you…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2412.06329/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
