<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Berkovich Motives · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2412.03382/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2412.03382/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Berkovich Motives — mentioned by aleph_minus_one</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46134184</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2412.03382:46134184</guid><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 13:21:11 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; I understand that some degree of formalism is required to enable the sharing of knowledge amongst people across a variety of languages, but sometimes I&amp;#x27;ll read a white paper and think &amp;quot;wow, this could be written a LOT more simply&amp;quot;. OK, challenge accepted: find a way to write one of the following papers much more simply: Fabian Hebestreit, Peter Scholze; A note on higher almost ring theory https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.01940 Peter Scholze; Berkovich Motives https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.03382 --- What I want to tell you with these examples (these are, of course, papers which are far above my…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2412.03382/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.AG</category></item></channel></rss>
