<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Limits of Inference Scaling Through Resampling · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2411.17501/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2411.17501/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Limits of Inference Scaling Through Resampling — mentioned by feznyng</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42498579</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2411.17501:42498579</guid><pubDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2024 00:03:46 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m a junior engineer and not an AI expert so please take the following rambling with a massive grain of salt. The black box that lets non-technical folk type in business requirements and generate an end to end application is still very much an open research question. Getting 70% on SWEBench is an absolute accomplishment, but have you seen the problems? 1. These aren&amp;#x27;t open-ended requests like here&amp;#x27;s a codebase, implement x feature and fix y bug. They&amp;#x27;re issues with detailed descriptions written by engineers evaluated against a set of unit tests. Who writes those descriptions? Who writes the…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2411.17501/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>The Limits of Inference Scaling Through Resampling — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42258272</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2411.17501:42258272</guid><pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2024 18:15:21 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Inference Scaling FLaws: The Limits of LLM Resampling with Imperfect Verifiers&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2411.17501/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
