<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Do LLMs Really Think Step-by-step In Implicit Reasoning? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2411.15862/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2411.15862/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Do LLMs Really Think Step-by-step In Implicit Reasoning? — mentioned by layoric</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44067910</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2411.15862:44067910</guid><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 22:37:19 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;There are several papers pointing towards &amp;#x27;thinking&amp;#x27; output is meaningless to the final output, and using dots, or pause tokens enabling the same additional rounds of throughput result in similar improvements. So in a lot of regards the &amp;#x27;thinking&amp;#x27; is mostly marketing. - &amp;quot;Think before you speak: Training Language Models With Pause Tokens&amp;quot; - https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.02226 - &amp;quot;Let&amp;#x27;s Think Dot by Dot: Hidden Computation in Transformer Language Models&amp;quot; - https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.15758 - &amp;quot;Do LLMs Really Think Step-by-step In Implicit Reasoning?&amp;quot; - https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.15862 - Video by…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2411.15862/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
