<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Existential Conversations with Large Language Models: Content, Community, and Culture · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2411.13223/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2411.13223/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Existential Conversations with Large Language Models: Content, Community, and Culture — mentioned by CharlesW</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44485130</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2411.13223:44485130</guid><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2025 23:32:27 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; The flip side of all this is of course the idea that there is still something emergent, unplanned, and mind-like. For people who have only a surface-level understanding of how they work, yes. A nuance of Clarke&amp;#x27;s law that &amp;quot;any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic&amp;quot; is that the bar is different for everybody and the depth of their understanding of the technology in question. That bar is so low for our largely technologically-illiterate public that a bothersome percentage of us have started to augment and even replace religious/mystical systems with AI powered…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2411.13223/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CY</category></item></channel></rss>
