<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Democratic AI is Possible. The Democracy Levels Framework Shows How It Might Work · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2411.09222/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2411.09222/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Democratic AI is Possible. The Democracy Levels Framework Shows How It Might Work — mentioned by avivo</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46437260</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2411.09222:46437260</guid><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 19:54:35 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;There is a lot of potential in this. Not just for government democracy, but for also introducing democratic elements into tech/AI policy, when that tech has impact comparable to many governments. I worked in tech, and after some formative experiences, shifted to working on helping ensuring ensure that tech&amp;#x27;s impact on society can serve the public interest. But that leaves the question of what &amp;quot;what is the public interest&amp;quot;? Sortitition / lottocracy / deliberative democracy / mini-publics all roughly refer to the same way to answer that question — providing a representative microcosm with the…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2411.09222/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CY</category></item></channel></rss>
