HackerPapers

arXiv:2411.03938cs.CY

Where postdoctoral journeys lead

Yueran Duan, Shahan Ali Memon, Bedoor AlShebli, Qing Guan, Petter Holme, Talal Rahwan

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Postdoctoral training is a career stage often described as a demanding and anxiety-laden time when many promising PhDs see their academic dreams slip away due to circumstances beyond their control. We use a unique data set of academic publishing and careers to chart the more or less successful postdoctoral paths. We build a measure of academic success on the citation patterns two to five years into a faculty career. Then, we monitor how students' postdoc positions -- in terms of relocation, change of topic, and early well-cited papers -- relate to their early-career success. One key finding is that the postdoc period seems more important than the doctoral training to achieve this form of success. This is especially interesting in light of the many studies of academic faculty hiring that link Ph.D. granting institutions and hires, omitting the postdoc stage. Another group of findings can be summarized as a Goldilocks principle: it seems beneficial to change one's direction, but not too much.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 122(2): 2402053122 (2025)
DOI
doi:10.1073/pnas.2402053122
Subjects
cs.CYComputers and Society physics.soc-phPhysics and Society

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Jan 2025 to Jan 2025.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • I wonder if they published that article too early, because the paper itself does not seem to be public yet. But I think this is the pre-print: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.03938

      optionalsquidView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.