<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>CHORDONOMICON: A Dataset of 666,000 Songs and their Chord Progressions · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2410.22046/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2410.22046/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>CHORDONOMICON: A Dataset of 666,000 Songs and their Chord Progressions — mentioned by mkl</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43725131</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2410.22046:43725131</guid><pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 04:53:03 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, I was disappointed. The original paper https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.22046 did look at chord progressions. They also trained a machine learning model to predict the next chord. Some of the chord progression data is in graph form at https://github.com/spyroskantarelis/chordonomicon. The raw chord data is at https://huggingface.co/datasets/ailsntua/Chordonomicon/tree/.... It consists of one row per song containing a list of chord names in song order (no timing information) and Spotify ids for track and artist. It seems like Spotify has a different id for every released version, so it&amp;#x27;s really…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2410.22046/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SD</category></item><item><title>CHORDONOMICON: A Dataset of 666,000 Songs and their Chord Progressions — mentioned by memset</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43724528</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2410.22046:43724528</guid><pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 02:54:50 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The way this analysis, and the original dataset were created, makes no sense. This is, in part, not the author&amp;#x27;s fault, since the original data [1, 2] is flawed. First, the original data was constructed like this: &amp;quot;...The next step was to format the raw HTML files into the full chord progression of each song, collapsing repeating identical chords into a single chord (’A G G A’ became ’A G A’)...&amp;quot; Already this makes no sense - the fact that a chord is repeated isn&amp;#x27;t some sort of typo (though maybe it is on UltimateGuitar). For example, a blues might have a progression C7 F7 C7 C7 - the fact…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2410.22046/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SD</category></item></channel></rss>
