<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Gender Bias of LLM in Economics: An Existentialism Perspective · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2410.19775/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2410.19775/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Gender Bias of LLM in Economics: An Existentialism Perspective — mentioned by rakoo</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46363797</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2410.19775:46363797</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 09:28:00 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Ahead of the International Women&amp;#x27;s Day, a UNESCO study revealed worrying tendencies in Large Language models (LLM) to produce gender bias, as well as homophobia and racial stereotyping. Women were described as working in domestic roles far more often than men ¬– four times as often by one model – and were frequently associated with words like “home”, “family” and “children”, while male names were linked to “business”, “executive”, “salary”, and “career”. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/generative-ai-unesco-stud... &amp;gt; Our analysis proves that bias in LLMs is not an unintended flaw but a…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2410.19775/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CY</category></item></channel></rss>
