<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>A Survey of Uncertainty Estimation in LLMs: Theory Meets Practice · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2410.15326/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2410.15326/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>A Survey of Uncertainty Estimation in LLMs: Theory Meets Practice — mentioned by esafak</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46167870</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2410.15326:46167870</guid><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2025 21:52:17 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;In that case I would start by studying the literature. The first two uncertainty estimation &amp;amp; out-of-distribution (OOD) detection approaches you mention, &amp;quot;Embedding Distance&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Self-Interrogation&amp;quot;, are sometimes called feature-space density estimation and consistency-based uncertainty quantification. Practical algorithms include Semantic Entropy, Self-Consistency / Verbalized Confidence, and Embedding-based Density (Mahalanobis Distance). References: A Survey of Uncertainty Estimation Methods on Large Language Models (https://aclanthology.org/2025.findings-acl.1101/) A Survey of…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2410.15326/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
