<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Amplituhedra and origami, I: tree level · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2410.09574/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2410.09574/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Amplituhedra and origami, I: tree level — mentioned by westurner</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49061396</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2410.09574:49061396</guid><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 19:15:36 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Amplituhedra and origami&amp;quot; (2025) https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.09574 ... &amp;quot;Origami Patterns Solve a Major Physics Riddle&amp;quot; (2025) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45492704 : &amp;gt; In a proof posted in October 2024 (opens a new tab), he showed that patterns that arise in origami can be translated into a set of points that together form the amplituhedron. Somehow, the way paper folds and the way particles collide produce the same geometric shape. --- There&amp;#x27;s also DNA Origami for (carbon-based) transistors and circuits; - /? dna origami - &amp;quot;DNA-directed nanofabrication of high-performance carbon…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2410.09574/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item><item><title>Amplituhedra and origami, I: tree level — mentioned by westurner</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45585779</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2410.09574:45585779</guid><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 22:25:48 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;From https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45241431 : &amp;gt; &amp;quot;Perihelion precession of planetary orbits solved from quantum field theory&amp;quot; (2025) https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.14447 : &amp;gt;&amp;gt; We derive the perihelion precession of planetary orbits using quantum field theory extending the Standard Model to include gravity. Modeling the gravitational bound state of an electron via the Dirac equation of unified gravity [Rep. Prog. Phys. 88, 057802 (2025)], and taking the classical planetary state limit, we obtain orbital dynamics exhibiting a precession in agreement with general relativity. This demonstrates…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2410.09574/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item><item><title>Amplituhedra and origami, I: tree level — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45553222</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2410.09574:45553222</guid><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2025 22:30:46 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Amplituhedra and Origami&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2410.09574/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item></channel></rss>
