<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>AgentHarm: A Benchmark for Measuring Harmfulness of LLM Agents · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2410.09024/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2410.09024/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>AgentHarm: A Benchmark for Measuring Harmfulness of LLM Agents — mentioned by TaurenHunter</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42647324</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2410.09024:42647324</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2025 16:36:36 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;More Agents is all you need&amp;quot; https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.05120 I could not find a &amp;quot;Agents considered harmful&amp;quot; related to AI, but there is this one: &amp;quot;AgentHarm: A benchmark for measuring harmfulness of LLM agents&amp;quot; https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.09024 This &amp;quot;Agents considered harmful&amp;quot; is not AI-related: https://www.scribd.com/document/361564026/Math-works-09&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2410.09024/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
