<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Conjecture of Dixmier for the first Weyl algebra is true · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2410.06959/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2410.06959/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Conjecture of Dixmier for the first Weyl algebra is true — mentioned by oliculipolicula</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48974742</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2410.06959:48974742</guid><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 05:40:19 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Wasn&amp;#x27;t it proven true in general for n=2 (NGL I wanted to suggest someone to go for the JC using 5.6 after the CDC proof came out, but then on reflection felt I should neither waste people&amp;#x27;s time NOR contribute to the myth of AI :) My prediction is that the bubble will burst in 2031 Q4, one year after the Riemann Hypothesis is expected to fall (according to Demis) After 2031, I will suggest going for the JC for N=4 because they would (dis)prove the Dixmier conjecture for N=2 :) https://xcancel.com/BrunsJulian1541/status/20790734625601334... https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.06959&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2410.06959/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.RA</category></item></channel></rss>
