<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Rodimus*: Breaking the Accuracy-Efficiency Trade-Off with Efficient Attentions · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2410.06577/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2410.06577/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Rodimus*: Breaking the Accuracy-Efficiency Trade-Off with Efficient Attentions — mentioned by juank10</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44296651</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2410.06577:44296651</guid><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2025 07:48:38 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Funnily enough, the code was deleted in the repo, but can still be seen in the commits. It&amp;#x27;s what you would expect from the paper :D On the general topic of non-attention LLMs, I recommend checking out the MesaNet [1], Rodimus [2], Gated DeltaNet [3], or Mamba2 [4]. They are currently SOTA. However, I have yet to see a compelling non attention based model that achieves good performance on code, math, reasoning, or multi-turn QA tasks. I do not think we are getting rid of attention soon, I believe the ability to look back is crucial in certain tasks. [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.05233 [2]…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2410.06577/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
