HackerPapers

arXiv:2410.05304cs.CR

Developing Assurance Cases for Adversarial Robustness and Regulatory Compliance in LLMs

Tomas Bueno Momcilovic, Dian Balta, Beat Buesser, Giulio Zizzo, Mark Purcell

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

This paper presents an approach to developing assurance cases for adversarial robustness and regulatory compliance in large language models (LLMs). Focusing on both natural and code language tasks, we explore the vulnerabilities these models face, including adversarial attacks based on jailbreaking, heuristics, and randomization. We propose a layered framework incorporating guardrails at various stages of LLM deployment, aimed at mitigating these attacks and ensuring compliance with the EU AI Act. Our approach includes a meta-layer for dynamic risk management and reasoning, crucial for addressing the evolving nature of LLM vulnerabilities. We illustrate our method with two exemplary assurance cases, highlighting how different contexts demand tailored strategies to ensure robust and compliant AI systems.

arXiv comments
Accepted to the ASSURE 2024 workshop
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CRCryptography and Security cs.AIArtificial Intelligence cs.SESoftware Engineering

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Oct 2024 to Oct 2024.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • I'm working on ways to allow developers and deployers of LLMs to express how and why their overall system is compliant and adversarially robust, and what to do when that's not the case. Specifically, my team and I are making assurance cases and ontologies that can seamlessly…

      TomasBMView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.