<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Uncovering the New Accessibility Crisis in Scholarly PDFs · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2410.03022/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2410.03022/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Uncovering the New Accessibility Crisis in Scholarly PDFs — mentioned by al_hag</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48507106</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2410.03022:48507106</guid><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 17:40:47 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;In the US, publicly funded organizations are required to code their PDF with semantic structure to support machine access by screen readers and other assistive technologies [1], [2]. Given the low adherence to accessibility standards e.g. in academic publishing [3], LLM parsing needs creating a commercial incentive for comparable structured access would be marvelous. [1] https://www.section508.gov/create/pdfs/common-tags-and-usage... [2] https://pdfa.org/resource/tagged-pdf-best-practice-guide-syn... [3] https://arxiv.org/html/2410.03022v1&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2410.03022/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DL</category></item></channel></rss>
