<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Benchmarking ChatGPT, Codeium, and GitHub Copilot: A Comparative Study of AI-Driven Programming and Debugging Assistants · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2409.19922/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2409.19922/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Benchmarking ChatGPT, Codeium, and GitHub Copilot: A Comparative Study of AI-Driven Programming and Debugging Assistants — mentioned by yallpendantools</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46933521</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2409.19922:46933521</guid><pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2026 12:00:49 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Copilot is notoriously bad. &amp;quot;notoriously bad&amp;quot; is news to me. I find no indication from online sources that would warrant the label &amp;quot;notoriously bad&amp;quot;. https://arxiv.org/html/2409.19922v1#S6 from 2024 concludes it has the highest success rate in easy and medium coding problems (with no clear winner for hard) and that it produces &amp;quot;slightly better runtime performance overall&amp;quot;. https://research.aimultiple.com/ai-coding-benchmark/ from 2025 has Copilot in a three-way tie for third above Gemini. &amp;gt; Have you tried (paid plans) codex, Claude or even Gemini on your legacy project? This is usually the…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2409.19922/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SE</category></item></channel></rss>
