HackerPapers

arXiv:2409.15452cs.CL

CUTE: Measuring LLMs' Understanding of Their Tokens

Lukas Edman, Helmut Schmid, Alexander Fraser

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) show remarkable performance on a wide variety of tasks. Most LLMs split text into multi-character tokens and process them as atomic units without direct access to individual characters. This raises the question: To what extent can LLMs learn orthographic information? To answer this, we propose a new benchmark, CUTE, which features a collection of tasks designed to test the orthographic knowledge of LLMs. We evaluate popular LLMs on CUTE, finding that most of them seem to know the spelling of their tokens, yet fail to use this information effectively to manipulate text, calling into question how much of this knowledge is generalizable.

arXiv comments
Accepted to EMNLP 2024 main conference
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CLComputation and Language

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Jan 2025 to Jan 2025.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

  1. DeepSeek-R1 1 comment
    • The CUTE benchmark is interesting, but doesn't have enough examples of the actual prompts used and model outputs to be able to evaluate the results. Obviously transformers internally manipulate their input at token level granularity, so to be successful at character level…

      HarHarVeryFunnyView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.