<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Michelangelo: Long Context Evaluations Beyond Haystacks via Latent Structure Queries · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2409.12640/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2409.12640/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Michelangelo: Long Context Evaluations Beyond Haystacks via Latent Structure Queries — mentioned by quelladora</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44307349</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2409.12640:44307349</guid><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2025 07:04:49 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;MRCR does go significantly beyond multi-needle retrieval - that&amp;#x27;s why the performance drops off as a function of context length. It&amp;#x27;s still a very simple task (reproduce the i^th essay about rocks), but it&amp;#x27;s very much not solved. See contextarena.ai and the original paper https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.12640 It also seems to match up well with evals like https://fiction.live/stories/Fiction-liveBench-Feb-21-2025/o... The other evals you mention are not necessarily harder than this relatively simple one..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2409.12640/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>Michelangelo: Long Context Evaluations Beyond Haystacks via Latent Structure Queries — mentioned by sebzim4500</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43475045</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2409.12640:43475045</guid><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 19:42:32 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Looks like it&amp;#x27;s this benchmark [1]. It&amp;#x27;s certainly less artificial than most long context benchmarks (that are basically just a big lookup table) but probably not as representative as Fiction.LiveBench [2], which asks specific questions about works of fanfiction (which are typically excluded from training sets because they are basically porn). [1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/2409.12640 [2] https://fiction.live/stories/Fiction-liveBench-Feb-20-2025/o...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2409.12640/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>Michelangelo: Long Context Evaluations Beyond Haystacks via Latent Structure Queries — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41614590</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2409.12640:41614590</guid><pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2024 04:19:20 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Long Context Evaluations Beyond Haystacks via Latent Structure Queries&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2409.12640/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
