HackerPapers

arXiv:2409.09860cs.CR

Revisiting Physical-World Adversarial Attack on Traffic Sign Recognition: A Commercial Systems Perspective

Ningfei Wang, Shaoyuan Xie, Takami Sato, Yunpeng Luo, Kaidi Xu, Qi Alfred Chen

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Traffic Sign Recognition (TSR) is crucial for safe and correct driving automation. Recent works revealed a general vulnerability of TSR models to physical-world adversarial attacks, which can be low-cost, highly deployable, and capable of causing severe attack effects such as hiding a critical traffic sign or spoofing a fake one. However, so far existing works generally only considered evaluating the attack effects on academic TSR models, leaving the impacts of such attacks on real-world commercial TSR systems largely unclear. In this paper, we conduct the first large-scale measurement of physical-world adversarial attacks against commercial TSR systems. Our testing results reveal that it is possible for existing attack works from academia to have highly reliable (100\%) attack success against certain commercial TSR system functionality, but such attack capabilities are not generalizable, leading to much lower-than-expected attack success rates overall. We find that one potential major factor is a spatial memorization design that commonly exists in today's commercial TSR systems. We design new attack success metrics that can mathematically model the impacts of such design on the TSR system-level attack success, and use them to revisit existing attacks. Through these efforts, we uncover 7 novel observations, some of which directly challenge the observations or claims in prior works due to the introduction of the new metrics.

arXiv comments
Accepted by NDSS 2025
Journal reference
DOI
doi:10.14722/ndss.2025.23090
Subjects
cs.CRCryptography and Security cs.CVComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Mar 2025 to Mar 2025.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • the paper behind the article: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.09860 the RP2 / SIP / FTE attacks they used (reproduced) * https://arxiv.org/pdf/1807.07769 * https://arxiv.org/pdf/1812.10217 * https://arxiv.org/pdf/2201.06192

      dijksterhuisView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.