HackerPapers

arXiv:2409.08108cs.PF

Microarchitectural comparison and in-core modeling of state-of-the-art CPUs: Grace, Sapphire Rapids, and Genoa

Jan Laukemann, Georg Hager, Gerhard Wellein

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

With Nvidia's release of the Grace Superchip, all three big semiconductor companies in HPC (AMD, Intel, Nvidia) are currently competing in the race for the best CPU. In this work we analyze the performance of these state-of-the-art CPUs and create an accurate in-core performance model for their microarchitectures Zen 4, Golden Cove, and Neoverse V2, extending the Open Source Architecture Code Analyzer (OSACA) tool and comparing it with LLVM-MCA. Starting from the peculiarities and up- and downsides of a single core, we extend our comparison by a variety of microbenchmarks and the capabilities of a full node. The "write-allocate (WA) evasion" feature, which can automatically reduce the memory traffic caused by write misses, receives special attention; we show that the Grace Superchip has a next-to-optimal implementation of WA evasion, and that the only way to avoid write allocates on Zen 4 is the explicit use of non-temporal stores.

arXiv comments
5 pages, 4 figures
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.PFPerformance cs.DCDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 1 HN submission from Sep 2024 to Sep 2024. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.