<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>A Confidential Computing Transparency Framework for a Comprehensive Trust Chain · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2409.03720/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2409.03720/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>A Confidential Computing Transparency Framework for a Comprehensive Trust Chain — mentioned by ramoz</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42455247</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2409.03720:42455247</guid><pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 21:11:05 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Reads as compliance controls being embedded into the code with integrated gates to halt execution, or verify controls are met at runtime - providing receipts with computed outputs. This is generally oriented toward multi-party, confidential, sensitive computing domains. As AI threat models develop, general compliance of things during training, or benchmarking, etc become more relevant as security posture requires. ref: https://openai.com/index/reimagining-secure-infrastructure-f... https://security.apple.com/blog/private-cloud-compute/ https://arxiv.org/html/2409.03720v2&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2409.03720/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
