Diffusion Models Are Real-Time Game Engines · HackerPapers discussions

Diffusion Models Are Real-Time Game Engines — mentioned by ben_w

Thu, 31 Oct 2024 06:28:23 GMT

We're not a huge distance from that already. https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.14837 Also TIL this is generated at 20 frames per second, the best I've used myself was "only" 4-5; does anyone know the performance and power consumption of a Google TPU?

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Diffusion Models Are Real-Time Game Engines — HN submission

Mon, 09 Sep 2024 09:20:00 GMT

Diffusion models are real-time game engines

1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

Diffusion Models Are Real-Time Game Engines — HN submission

Thu, 29 Aug 2024 04:54:57 GMT

Diffusion models are real time game engines

1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

Diffusion Models Are Real-Time Game Engines — HN submission

Thu, 29 Aug 2024 00:49:38 GMT

Diffusion Models Are Real-Time Game Engines

2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

Diffusion Models Are Real-Time Game Engines — mentioned by krasin

Wed, 28 Aug 2024 06:53:06 GMT

It's very hard to respond to a comment like that, since there's no specifics, just a plain disagreement. On my side, I would like to point that the today HN thread ([1]) that discusses a paper GameNGen ([2]) that runs Doom with diffusion models was trained on TPUs. I don't see a dependency on NVIDIA there. If there's a more specific rebuttal to my original statement, please, don't hesitate to state it. 1. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41375548 2. https://gamengen.github.io/ 3. https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.14837

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.