<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>CodeGraph: Enhancing Graph Reasoning of LLMs with Code · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2408.13863/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2408.13863/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>CodeGraph: Enhancing Graph Reasoning of LLMs with Code — mentioned by underlines</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43935875</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2408.13863:43935875</guid><pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 12:07:59 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder why most agentic patterns don&amp;#x27;t use multiple different retrieval strategies simultaneously and why most of them don&amp;#x27;t use CodeGraph 1 during discovery phase. Embeddings aren&amp;#x27;t enough, Agent induced function/class name search isn&amp;#x27;t enough. [1] CodeGraph https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.13863&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2408.13863/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>CodeGraph: Enhancing Graph Reasoning of LLMs with Code — mentioned by underlines</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42694430</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2408.13863:42694430</guid><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2025 06:40:16 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;For 2 years I built RAG apps for clients. They are not Code-Assistants but everytime I see code assistants solely relying on embeddings to find the right pieces as context, it feels wrong to me: Code is very well structured. Based on a starting point (current cursor, current file, or results of an embedding search result) you would probably fair better to traverse the code tree up and down building a tree or using Abstract Syntax Trees (ASTs) as described in this blog post [4]. It&amp;#x27;s like a tree search in order to get relevant code pieces for a certain task, and it imitates what human coders…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2408.13863/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
