HackerPapers

arXiv:2408.12569cs.CV

Sapiens: Foundation for Human Vision Models

Rawal Khirodkar, Timur Bagautdinov, Julieta Martinez, Su Zhaoen, Austin James, Peter Selednik, Stuart Anderson, Shunsuke Saito

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

We present Sapiens, a family of models for four fundamental human-centric vision tasks -- 2D pose estimation, body-part segmentation, depth estimation, and surface normal prediction. Our models natively support 1K high-resolution inference and are extremely easy to adapt for individual tasks by simply fine-tuning models pretrained on over 300 million in-the-wild human images. We observe that, given the same computational budget, self-supervised pretraining on a curated dataset of human images significantly boosts the performance for a diverse set of human-centric tasks. The resulting models exhibit remarkable generalization to in-the-wild data, even when labeled data is scarce or entirely synthetic. Our simple model design also brings scalability -- model performance across tasks improves as we scale the number of parameters from 0.3 to 2 billion. Sapiens consistently surpasses existing baselines across various human-centric benchmarks. We achieve significant improvements over the prior state-of-the-art on Humans-5K (pose) by 7.6 mAP, Humans-2K (part-seg) by 17.1 mIoU, Hi4D (depth) by 22.4% relative RMSE, and THuman2 (normal) by 53.5% relative angular error. Project page: https://about.meta.com/realitylabs/codecavatars/sapiens.

arXiv comments
ECCV 2024 (Oral)
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CVComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Aug 2024 to Aug 2024. Found in 1 HN submission from Aug 2024 to Aug 2024. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • The shadiness about Facebook's proprietary dataset of 300 million photos is concerning and should draw more attention. At the very least it is scientifically unacceptable - we should not high-five Big Tech researchers for intentionally unreproducible research. And if Meta is…

      aithrowaway1987View on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.